Solutions

Cable car (Gothenborg)

Cable car

Type of solution: Adding a terminal
Node: Adding a mode
Link or contact: Gothenborg


An example of a successful project framing of this relation linking city, region, national and EU level is the planned Gondola Project covering the construction of a cable car in the city of Gothenburg crossing the Göta älv river. The current public transport system is very radial, like spokes in a wheel passing one narrow hub in the centre near the central station. To connect the northern and southern part of the city, separated by the crossing Göta älv river, all public transport (trams, buses) cross the river at the Göta Älv bridge. To get a better and faster connection, without creating new barriers between the northern and southern part as higher bridges for shipping do, the cable car is developed. This cable car connects Järntorget on the southern river bank with Lindholmen, Västra Ramberget and Wieseigrensplatsen on the northern part. The new cable car will be fully integrated in Gothenburg’s public transport system and thereby unburden the hub. It will connect the northern and southern part of the city, overcome the river barrier, and giving more and faster options to travel by public transport. Public transport may become more attractive for commuters compared by using roads, having also impact on the road use. So this project will achieve several local, regional, national and EU targets and applied for funding from the CEF Blending Call.

Impact Overview


Impact criteria / Questions / Answer
Questions
Answer
A Accessibility
Q:The solution impacts the chosen modality of the flows
A:1
Q:The solution impacts the route of the flows
A:1
Q:The solution impacts the volume of the flows
A:1
Q:The solution impacts the timing of the flows
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the available infrastructure capacity
A:1
B Safety
Q:The solution impacts the number of pedestrian casualties
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the number of cyclist casualties
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the number of motorised vehicle casualties
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the external safety of dangerous goods transport
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the external safety of warehousing operations
A:0
C Economy
Q:The solution impacts the attractivity of the local scale (city) of the Node for investments (value capturing)
A:2
Q:The solution impacts the attractivity of the FUA from logisctics perspective of the Node for investments (value capturing)
A:1
Q:The solution impacts the price of living in urban areas (socio economic)
A:1
Q:The solution impacts synergies with other sectors
A:1
Q:The solution impacts the GDP
A:1
D Vitality
Q:The solution impacts the air quality
A:2
Q:The solution impacts the noise levels
A:0
Q:The solution impacts health of citizens
A:1
Q:The solution impacts the ease of moving in the city for citizens
A:2
Q:The solution impacts the quality of living
A:1
E Connectivity
Q:The solution impacts the connection between the city and the functional urban area from a mobility perspective
A:2
Q:The solution impacts the connection between the city and the functional area from a logistics perspective
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the connection with other Nodes on the Corridor
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the connection with other TEN-T Corridors
A:0
Q:The solution impacts the connection with the comprehensive network
A:0